Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
J. Tredwell Richards et al., Appellants, v. Norman S. Washburn, Jr., et al., Respondents, 1900 — 163 N.Y. 585 · caselaw · US
General
J. Tredwell Richards et al., Appellants, v. Norman S. Washburn, Jr., et al., Respondents
163 N.Y. 585·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
J. Tredwell Richards et al., Appellants, v. Norman S. Washburn, Jr., et al., Respondents.
Bichareis v. Washburn, 28 App. Div. 109, affirmed.
(Submitted May 28, 1900;
decided June 5, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made April 7, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.
J. Tredwell Richards for appellants.
William H. Sage for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur : Parker, Oh. J., Cray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Bandon and Werner, JJ.