Contracts · MBE-tested
Niagara Hudson Power Corp. v. Hoey, Collector of Internal Revenue
313 U.S. 571·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 871.
Niagara Hudson Power Corp. v. Hoey, Collector of Internal Revenue.
May 5, 1941.
Messrs. Horace R. Lamb and Randall J. Le Boeuj, Jr. for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Messrs. Bewail Key, Richard H. Demuth, and Joseph M. Jones for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.