General
Edmund G. Chapman, Respondent, v. Robah Alice La Dow, as Executrix of Charles La Dow, Deceased, Appellant, Impleaded with Another
184 N.Y. 608·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edmund G. Chapman, Respondent, v. Robah Alice La Dow, as Executrix of Charles La Dow, Deceased, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.
Chapman v. La Dow, 103 App. Div. 598, affirmed.
(Argued March 28, 1906;
decided April 17, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 10, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
J. Newton Fiero for apjiellant.
Samuel S. Ilatt for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner and Hiscock, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J. Not sitting: Chase, J.