Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Arizona v. California et al., 1955 — 348 U.S. 907 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Arizona v. California et al.
348 U.S. 907·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 10,
Original.
Arizona v. California et al.
[MAJORITY]
The motion of the State of California for an allowance of time to file a brief in response to the briefs of Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, and New Mexico is granted. California is allowed thirty days from this date to file its brief in response.
Northcutt Ely for the State of California, defendant.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.