Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of Grading, etc., Fifth Avenue to the City Line of Brooklyn in the Town of New Utrecht; Estates of Kent and Langley, Appellants, 1897 — 152 N.Y. 648 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of Grading, etc., Fifth Avenue to the City Line of Brooklyn in the Town of New Utrecht; Estates of Kent and Langley, Appellants
152 N.Y. 648·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Grading, etc., Fifth Avenue to the City Line of Brooklyn in the Town of New Utrecht; Estates of Kent and Langley, Appellants.
Matter of Fifth Avenue, 91 Hun, 259, affirmed.
(Argued March 15, 1897;
decided March 26, 1897.)
Appeal from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 12, 1895, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming the report of commissioners for the g’rading of Fifth avenue.
H. B. Hubbard and John D. Pray for appellants.
James C. Church for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.