Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Maryland et al. v. Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, et al., 1968 — 390 U.S. 1019 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Maryland et al. v. Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, et al.
390 U.S. 1019·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 742.
Maryland et al. v. Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, et al.
J. Albert Woll, Laurence Gold and Thomas E. Harris for American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations, and Henry Kaiser and Ronald Rosenberg for American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, on the motions.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from D. C. Md. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 389 U. S. 1031.) Motions of American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations, and American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, for leave to file briefs,
as amici curiae, granted.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.