General
UNITED STATES, Plaintiff In Error, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY CO., Defendant in Error
32 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES, Plaintiff In Error, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY CO., Defendant in Error.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 27, 1929.
No. 5355.
Geo. J. Hatfield, U. S. Atty., and Geo. M. Naus, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal.
John Ralph Wilson, of San Francisco, Cal. (Everette C. McKeage, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for defendant in error.
Before GILBERT, RUDKIN, and DIETRICH, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Reversed, on authority of United States v. John Barth Co. and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 49 S. Ct. 366, 73 L. Ed.-, decided by the Supreme Court May 13, 1929.