Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Elizabeth Reich, Respondent, v. Eva S. Cochran et al., as Executors and Trustees under the Will of William F. Cochran, Deceased, Appellants, 1908 — 190 N.Y. 552 · caselaw · US
General
Elizabeth Reich, Respondent, v. Eva S. Cochran et al., as Executors and Trustees under the Will of William F. Cochran, Deceased, Appellants
190 N.Y. 552·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Elizabeth Reich, Respondent, v. Eva S. Cochran et al., as Executors and Trustees under the Will of William F. Cochran, Deceased, Appellants.
Belch v. Cochran, llo App. Div. 900, affirmed.
(Argued December 11, 1907;
decided January 7, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 30, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee in an action for conversion.
James L. Bishop and Percy U. Stewart for appellants.
Alton B. Parker, John F. Oloonan and Nathaniel P, Peich for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Dissenting: Hiscook, J.