Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas Gilmore STEWART, petitioner, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, et al., 2014 — 134 S. Ct. 1534 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Thomas Gilmore STEWART, petitioner, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, et al.
134 S. Ct. 1534188 L. Ed. 2d 453·Supreme Court of the United States·2014
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas Gilmore STEWART, petitioner,
v.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, et al.
No. 13-8101.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 10, 2014.
Former decision, 2013 WL 28379.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, denied.