Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Solomon Hanford, Substituted Plaintiff, Respondent, v. The Washington Life Insurance Company, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 614 · caselaw · US
General
Solomon Hanford, Substituted Plaintiff, Respondent, v. The Washington Life Insurance Company, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
149 N.Y. 614·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Solomon Hanford, Substituted Plaintiff, Respondent, v. The Washington Life Insurance Company, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
Prindle v. Washington L. Ins. Co., 73 Hun, 448, affirmed
(Argued June 3, 1896;
decided June 19, 1896.)
Appeal from order of the G-eneral Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered February 26, 1894, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee and granted a new trial.
Foster & Thomson for appellant.
Solomon Hanford, respondent in person.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff on stipulation, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except Martin, J., not sitting.