Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of The Rochester and Glen Haven Railroad Company, Appellant, to Acquire Land of Ferdinand and Barbara Griebel, Respondents, 1891 — 128 N.Y. 611 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of The Rochester and Glen Haven Railroad Company, Appellant, to Acquire Land of Ferdinand and Barbara Griebel, Respondents
128 N.Y. 611·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of The Rochester and Glen Haven Railroad Company, Appellant, to Acquire Land of Ferdinand and Barbara Griebel, Respondents.
(Argued June 8, 1891;
decided June 23, 1891.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, made at the January Term, 1891, which reversed an order of Special Term appointing commissioners.
John Powers for motion.
Edward W. Maurer opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to grant motion; no opinion.
All concur.
Motion granted.