Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Spalding v. The People of the State of New York, ex rel, Frederick F. Backus, 1844 — 43 U.S. 66 · caselaw · US
General
Spalding v. The People of the State of New York, ex rel, Frederick F. Backus
43 U.S. 662 How. 66·Supreme Court of the United States·1844
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Spalding v. The People of the State of New York, ex rel, Frederick F. Backus.
An appeal bond given to the people or to the relator is good, and if forfeited, may be sued upon by either.
Beardsley moved to dismiss the writ of error in this • case, because Spalding had given a bond to The People of the State of New York, or Frederick F. Backus.
[MAJORITY — But Mr. Justice STORY]
But Mr. Justice STORY
delivered the opinion of the court, and said that the bond was good, and, if forfeited, might be sued upon in the name of the people or of the relator, at the option of the government.