Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SHEDD v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS EX REL. HEALY, STATE'S ATTORNEY, 1910 — 217 U.S. 597 · caselaw · US
General
SHEDD v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS EX REL. HEALY, STATE'S ATTORNEY
217 U.S. 597·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SHEDD v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS EX REL. HEALY, STATE’S ATTORNEY.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.'
No. 708.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted May 16, 1910.
Decided May 31, 1910.
A judgment of ouster rendered in quo warranto proceeding, 241 Illinois, 155, affirmed without opinion.
The facts involved the validity of a judgment of ouster rendered by the Supreme Court of Illinois in a quo warranto proceeding.
Mr. Harry S. Mecartney for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. James Hamilton Lewis for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs.