Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re Rubin Cecil SHEFFIELD, Bankrupt. Theodore L. WADE, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant, 1975 — 521 F.2d 859 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
In re Rubin Cecil SHEFFIELD, Bankrupt. Theodore L. WADE, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant
521 F.2d 859·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1975
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re Rubin Cecil SHEFFIELD, Bankrupt. Theodore L. WADE, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 75-2051
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 23, 1975.
Charles S. White-Spunner, U. S. Atty., Edward J. Vulevich, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Mobile, Ala., Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gilbert E. Andrews, Chief, App. Section, Crombie J. D. Garrett, Wynette J. Hewett, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellant.
Theodore L. Wade, pro se.
Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
PER CURIAM:
The sole issue on appeal in this case is whether Ala.Code Title 33, § 9 meets the “one office” requirement of Int.Rev.Code § 6323(f) for the filing of federal tax liens. The district court held that the requirement was not met.
In Gordon White Construction Company, Inc., Bankrupt, Henry A. Stikes, Sr., Trustee v. Southland Investment Co., et al., 5 Cir. 1975, 521 F.2d 856, decided October 16, 1975, we found on parallel facts that the one office requirement was met.
Reversed and remanded.