Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. California, 1949 — 337 U.S. 952 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. California
337 U.S. 952·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Mr. Justice Jackson took np part in the consideration or decision of this question.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 12, Original.
United States v. California.
[MAJORITY]
The order of February 12, 1949, appointing William H. Davis, Esquire, of New York City, Special Master herein'is continued and he is directed to proceed with all convenient speed, with .respect to the seven coastal segments enumerated in Groups I and II of the Master’s Report, to consider: (1) a simplification of the issues; (2) statements of the issues and’amendments thereto in the nature of pleadings; (3) the nature and form of evidence proposed. to be submitted, including admission of facts and of documents which will avoid unnecessary proof; and report thereon to the Court.
Should the office of Master become vacant during the recess of the Court, The Chief Justice shall have authority to make a new designation which shall have the same effect as if originally made by the Court herein.
Mr. Justice Jackson took np part in the consideration or decision of this question.