General
The Bank of America, Respondent, v. East River Silk Company, Appellant
149 N.Y. 607·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Bank of America, Respondent, v. East River Silk Company, Appellant.
Bank of America v. East River Silk Co., 90 Hun, 608, affirmed.
(Argued May 25, 1896;
decided June 9, 1896.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made November 15, 1895, which affirmed an order of the Special Term denying a motion to vacate an attachment.
John Sabine Smith for appellant.
Charles E. Rushmore for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
All concur.