Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
DeGREGORY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, 1961 — 368 U.S. 19 · caselaw · US
General
DeGREGORY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
368 U.S. 19·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Brennan dissent.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DeGREGORY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.
No. 237,
Misc.
Decided October 23, 1961.
Howard S. Whiteside for appellant.
Gardner C. Turner, Attorney General of New Hampshire, pro se.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Brennan dissent.