Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Columbian Correspondence College, Appellant, v. George B. Cortelyou, Postmaster-General, et al., 1906 — 200 U.S. 615 · caselaw · US
General
The Columbian Correspondence College, Appellant, v. George B. Cortelyou, Postmaster-General, et al.
200 U.S. 615·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 242.
The Columbian Correspondence College, Appellant, v. George B. Cortelyou, Postmaster-General, et al.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted February 19, 1906.
Decided February 26, 1906.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.
Per Curiam.
Mr. Arthur A. Birhey and Mr.' Charles A. Ray for appellant. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for appellees.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. South Carolina v. Seymour, 153 U. S. 353, 357; United States v. Lynch, 137 U. S. 280, 286; Code District of Columbia, § 233.