Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles W. Hunter et al., Petitioners, v. Rebecca A. Johnson et al., 1908 — 209 U.S. 541 · caselaw · US
General
Charles W. Hunter et al., Petitioners, v. Rebecca A. Johnson et al.
209 U.S. 541·Supreme Court of the United States·1908
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 199.
Charles W. Hunter et al., Petitioners, v. Rebecca A. Johnson et al.
Argued April 14, 1908.
Decided April 20, 1908.
Mr. A. B. Shafer, Mr. L. P. Berry and Mr. James K. Jones for petitioners.
No appearance for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
On a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Decree of United States Circuit Court of Appeals reversed with costs and decree of Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas affirmed with costs and cause remanded to that court. Ballard v. Hunter, 204 U. S- 241.