Administrative
J. Holbrook Cushman et al., Executors, etc., Appellants, v. Rachel A. Addison, Respondent
52 N.Y. 628·New York Court of Appeals·1873·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
J. Holbrook Cushman et al., Executors, etc., Appellants, v. Rachel A. Addison, Respondent.
(Argued January 27, 1873;
decided February 11, 1873.
This case presented the question as to the validity of the transfers sought to be set aside in Loesehigk v. Hatfield (51 N. Y., 660), and was decided upon the authority of that case.
W. Watson for the appellants.
A. P. Pyett for the respondents.
[MAJORITY — Sapallo, J.,]
Sapallo, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.