Property · MBE-tested
MANCHESTER AUTO & MACHINE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Elmer J. BOOS and Harmar D. Denny, Jr., Ancillary Receivers of Interstate Transit Company, Appellees
66 F.2d 1015·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MANCHESTER AUTO & MACHINE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Elmer J. BOOS and Harmar D. Denny, Jr., Ancillary Receivers of Interstate Transit Company, Appellees.
No. 5113.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Aug. 24, 1933.
Frederic W. Miller, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.
Wm. H. Eckert, Barton Grubbs, II, and Smith, Buchanan, Scott & Gordon, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., and John R. Bullock and Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, all of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellees.
Before BUFFINGTON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and DICKINSON, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The underlying question in this bankruptcy case is whether the landlord resumed possession and occupancy of the leased premises which the receiver in bankruptcy sought to surrender. The court found such was the case. 4 F. Snpp. 485. A study of the proofs brings ns to the same conclusion. We therefore affirm the decree entered below.