Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The City and County of Denver et al., Petitioners, v. The New York Trust Company et al.; The City and County of Denver et al., Petitioners, v. The Denver Union Water Company et al., 1912 — 225 U.S. 707 · caselaw · US
General
The City and County of Denver et al., Petitioners, v. The New York Trust Company et al.; The City and County of Denver et al., Petitioners, v. The Denver Union Water Company et al.
225 U.S. 707·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1127.
and No. 1128.
The City and County of Denver et al., Petitioners, v. The New York Trust Company et al.; The City and County of Denver et al., Petitioners, v. The Denver Union Water Company et al.
May 27, 1912.
Mr. George L. Nye, Mr. H. A. Lindsley, Mr. C. S. Thomas, Mr. 'C. W. Waterman, Mr. W. H. Bryant and Mr. George Q. Richmond for the petitioners. Mr. Gerald Hughes, Mr. Clayton C. Dorsey, Mr. Joel F. Vaile and Mr. Henry McAllister,. Jr., for the respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writes of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted.