General
Georgia Rail Road & Banking Co. v. Musgrove, State Revenue Commissioner
335 U.S. 900·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Mr. Justice Jackson is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
January 3, 1949.
No. 413.
Georgia Rail Road & Banking Co. v. Musgrove, State Revenue Commissioner.
James E. Harper, W. Inman Curry and Rembert Marshall for appellant.
Eugene Cook, Attorney General of Georgia, Claude Shaw, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, and Victor Davidson for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Redwine substituted for Musgrove as appellee. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the court below is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it.
Mr. Justice Jackson is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.