Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Twentieth Century Associates, Inc. v. Waldman, 1946 — 326 U.S. 697 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Twentieth Century Associates, Inc. v. Waldman
326 U.S. 697·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Me. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of this ease.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 726.
Twentieth Century Associates, Inc. v. Waldman.
January 28, 1946.
Mr. Benjamin Bernstein for appellant.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Block v. Hirsh, 256 U. S. 135; Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. Feldman, 256 U. S. 170; East New York Savings Bank v. Hahn, 326 U. S. 230.
Me. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of this ease.