Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Linder v. Collins et al., Members of the Board of County Commissioners of Wallace County, Kansas, et al.; Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al. v. Switchmen's Union of North America et al.; James et al., trading as Chicago Board Co., v. Federal Trade Commission; Wegmann v. Mannino et al.; Friedman et ux., doing business as City Metal Salvage Co., v. Hill; DeLucia v. United States; Maher v. Ellsworth et al.; Shiels et al. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.; Juelich v. United States; Rousseau v. Hurtado, Executrix; Hollis v. Texas, 1958 — 358 U.S. 896 · caselaw · US