Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Prudence-Bonds Corporation (New Corporation), Successor Trustee, et al. v. State Street Trust Co., Trustee, 1953 — 346 U.S. 835 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Prudence-Bonds Corporation (New Corporation), Successor Trustee, et al. v. State Street Trust Co., Trustee
346 U.S. 835·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 211.
Prudence-Bonds Corporation (New Corporation), Successor Trustee, et al. v. State Street Trust Co., Trustee.
Charles M. McCarty and Geo. C. Wildermuth for the Prudence-Bonds Corporation, Samuel Silbiger for Eddy, and Aaron Schwartz for Beardsley, petitioners. John Graham Brooks, A. Donald MacKinnon and William Eldred Jackson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.