Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co., 1965 — 382 U.S. 898 · caselaw · US
General
Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.
382 U.S. 898·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
November 8, 1965.
No. 27.
Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.
Clarence M. Mulholland, Edward J. Hickey, Jr., and Richard R. Lyman for the Railway Labor Executives’ Association, as amicus curiae, urging reversal.
Waldron A. Gregory and William R. Denton for respondent, in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. (Certiorari granted, 380 U. S. 905.) Motion of the Railway Labor Executives’ Association for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, granted.