Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louisiana v. Mississippi et al., 1964 — 377 U.S. 901 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Louisiana v. Mississippi et al.
377 U.S. 901·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
April 20, 1964.
No. 14,
Original.
Louisiana v. Mississippi et al.
[For earlier orders herein, see 375 U. S. 803, 950.]
[MAJORITY]
It is ordered that Honorable Marvin Jones, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Claims, be, and he is hereby, appointed Special Master in this case, with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.
The master shall be allowed his actual expenses. The allowances to him, the compensation paid to his technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his report, and all other proper expenses shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court hereafter may direct.
The request of the State of Mississippi for admissions is referred to the Special Master for consideration and determination.