General
In the Matter of the Application of Doris GREEN, for the Remission of Forfeiture in the case of United States v. Charles J. Steinberg, as Principal, and Doris Green, as Surety; Doris GREEN, Plaintiff-in-Error, Defendant Below, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-in-Error, Plaintiff Below
19 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Doris GREEN, for the Remission of Forfeiture in the case of United States v. Charles J. Steinberg, as Principal, and Doris Green, as Surety. Doris GREEN, Plaintiff-in-Error, Defendant Below, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-in-Error, Plaintiff Below.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 2, 1927.
No. 317.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Emanuel Tacker, of New York City, for plaintiff in error.
Charles H. Tuttle, U. S. Atty., and Edward Feldman, both of New York City, for the United States.
Before L. HAND and SWAN, Circuit Judges, and CAMPBELL, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed.