Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
H. K. Porter Co., Inc., Disston Division-Danville Works v. National Labor Relations Board et al., 1966 — 385 U.S. 851 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
H. K. Porter Co., Inc., Disston Division-Danville Works v. National Labor Relations Board et al.
385 U.S. 851·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 392.
H. K. Porter Co., Inc., Disston Division-Danville Works v. National Labor Relations Board et al.
Donald C. Winson and Bartholomew A. Diggins for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come and Elliott Moore for the National Labor Relations Board, and Bernard Kleiman, Elliot Bredhoff and Michael Got-tesman for United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CJO, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.