Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alfred Fatman, Respondent, v. Solomon J. Fatman, Individually and as Executor, etc., Appellant, 1892 — 133 N.Y. 674 · caselaw · US
General
Alfred Fatman, Respondent, v. Solomon J. Fatman, Individually and as Executor, etc., Appellant
133 N.Y. 674·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Alfred Fatman, Respondent, v. Solomon J. Fatman, Individually and as Executor, etc., Appellant.
(Argued May 23, 1892;
decided June 7, 1892.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Court pf Common Pleas in and for the city and county of New York, made May 2, 1892, which affirmed an order of Special Term •denying a motion to vacate an order for the examination of defendant as a party before trial.
J. A. Shoudy for appellant.
William J. Hardy for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
.Appeal dismissed.