Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louis Duschnes, Appellant, v. Julius M. Heyman, Executor of Julia Heyman, Deceased, Respondent, 1899 — 158 N.Y. 735 · caselaw · US
General
Louis Duschnes, Appellant, v. Julius M. Heyman, Executor of Julia Heyman, Deceased, Respondent
158 N.Y. 735·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louis Duschnes, Appellant, v. Julius M. Heyman, Executor of Julia Heyman, Deceased, Respondent.
(Argued March 20, 1899;
decided April 18, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 19, 1896, upon an order affirming a judgment of the late Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at an Equity Term.
Duschnes v. Heyman, 2 App. Div. 354, affirmed.
Edward W. S. Johnston for appellant.
John Frankenheimer for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.