General
The Bornn Hat Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The United States
223 U.S. 713·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 574.
The Bornn Hat Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The United States.
In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Motion to affirm submitted January 9, 1912.
Decided January 15, 1912.
Mr. Abram I. Elkus for the plaintiff in error. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed on the authority of Wilson v. United States, 221 U. S. 361; Dreier v. United States, 221 U. S. 394; American Tobacco Company v. Werckmeister, 207 U. S. 284, 302; Hale v. Henkel, 201 U. S. 43, and cause remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Southern Districtof New York.