General
Edward A. Kitchell, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Appellant
151 N.Y. 630·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward A. Kitchell, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Appellant.
Hitchell v. Brooklyn Heights JR. JR. Go., 10 Mise. Rep. 277, affirmed.
(Argued October 27, 1896;
decided December 1, 1896.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court of Brooklyn, entered November 28, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Matthew Hale and Albert C. Tennant for appellant.
Frederick E. Crane for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.