Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Albert Howe, Appellant, v. Thomas J. Learey et al., Respondents, 1892 — 131 N.Y. 645 · caselaw · US
General
Albert Howe, Appellant, v. Thomas J. Learey et al., Respondents
131 N.Y. 645·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Albert Howe, Appellant, v. Thomas J. Learey et al., Respondents.
(Argued February 29, 1892;
decided March 15, 1892.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made December 14, 1891, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate an order obtained by the defendant Jessie Learey for the examination of the plaintiff and the defendant Thomas J. Learey.
Abraham L. Fromme for Thomas J. Learey, appellant.
William Henry Arnoux for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.