Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LEHIGH CASINO, INC., v. PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD et al., 1959 — 361 U.S. 85 · caselaw · US
General
LEHIGH CASINO, INC., v. PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD et al.
361 U.S. 85·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LEHIGH CASINO, INC., v. PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD et al.
No. 379.
Decided November 9, 1959.
Henry. I. Jacobson for appellant.
Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, ■Lois G. Forer, Deputy Attorney General, George G. Lindsay, Assistant Attorney General, and Russell C. Wismer, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.