Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
California v. Braeseke, 1980 — 444 U.S. 1064 · caselaw · US
General
California v. Braeseke
444 U.S. 1064·Supreme Court of the United States·1980
Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Marshall, and Mr. Justice Stevens would deny the application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. A-636.
California v. Braeseke.
[MAJORITY]
Application for stay of execution and enforcement of judgment of the Supreme Court of California, presented to Mr. Justice Rehnquist, and by him referred to the Court, granted pending timely filing and disposition of petition for writ of certiorari.
Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Marshall, and Mr. Justice Stevens would deny the application.