Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William A. Calvert, Administrator, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Southern Railway Company, 1902 — 187 U.S. 636 · caselaw · US
General
William A. Calvert, Administrator, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Southern Railway Company
187 U.S. 636·Supreme Court of the United States·1902
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 60.
William A. Calvert, Administrator, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Southern Railway Company.
In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South Carolina.
Argued October 31, 1902.
Decided November 3, 1902.
Mr. William N. Graydon for the plaintiff in error. Mr. George E. Hamilton and Mr. Fairfax Harrison for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed, with costs,- on the authority of St. Louis and San Francisco Railway Company v. James, 161 U. S. 545; and see Calvert v. Southern Railway Company, 64 S. C. 143; 41 S. E. Rep. 963.