Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wesley Eugene BROOKS, petitioner, v. MINNESOTA; and Wesley Eugene Brooks, petitioner, v. Minnesota., 2013 — 569 U.S. 945 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Wesley Eugene BROOKS, petitioner, v. MINNESOTA; and Wesley Eugene Brooks, petitioner, v. Minnesota.
569 U.S. 945185 L. Ed. 2d 863·Supreme Court of the United States·2013
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Wesley Eugene BROOKS, petitioner,
v.
MINNESOTA; and Wesley Eugene Brooks, petitioner,
v.
Minnesota.
No. 12-478.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 22, 2013.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgments vacated, and cases remanded to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota for further consideration in light of Missouri v. McNeely, 569 U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 1552, ---L.Ed.2d ---- (2013).