Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES, Plaintiff in Error, v. 73 BALES CONTAINING WOOL MARKED CC 2142/2214; Robert W. A Wood, Claimant, Defendant in Error; UNITED STATES, Plaintiff in Error, v. 381 BALES CONTAINING WOOL, MARKED ROBERT W. A. WOOD, and Corn Exchange Bank of Philadelphia, Defendants in Error; UNITED STATES, Plaintiff in Error, v. 228 BALES CONTAINING WOOL, MARKED CO 693/730, 390/1478, 2101/2141; Robert W. A. Wood, Claimant, Defendant in Error, 1925 — 7 F.2d 1022 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES, Plaintiff in Error, v. 73 BALES CONTAINING WOOL MARKED CC 2142/2214; Robert W. A Wood, Claimant, Defendant in Error; UNITED STATES, Plaintiff in Error, v. 381 BALES CONTAINING WOOL, MARKED ROBERT W. A. WOOD, and Corn Exchange Bank of Philadelphia, Defendants in Error; UNITED STATES, Plaintiff in Error, v. 228 BALES CONTAINING WOOL, MARKED CO 693/730, 390/1478, 2101/2141; Robert W. A. Wood, Claimant, Defendant in Error
7 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES, Plaintiff in Error, v. 73 BALES CONTAINING WOOL MARKED CC 2142/2214; Robert W. A Wood, Claimant, Defendant in Error. UNITED STATES, Plaintiff in Error, v. 381 BALES CONTAINING WOOL, MARKED ROBERT W. A. WOOD, and Corn Exchange Bank of Philadelphia, Defendants in Error. UNITED STATES, Plaintiff in Error, v. 228 BALES CONTAINING WOOL, MARKED CO 693/730, 390/1478, 2101/2141; Robert W. A. Wood, Claimant, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 21, 1925.)
Nos. 358-360.
Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Emory R. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (John M. Ryan, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error. Wise, Whitney & Parker, of New York City (Henry A. Wise and Carl E. Whitney, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant, in error.
Before ROGERS, MAN-TON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed.