Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles S. Fairchild et al., as Executors, v. Margaret B. Edson, Appellant, Impleaded with The New York Association for Improving the Condition of the Poor, Respondent, et al., 1894 — 144 N.Y. 645 · caselaw · US
General
Charles S. Fairchild et al., as Executors, v. Margaret B. Edson, Appellant, Impleaded with The New York Association for Improving the Condition of the Poor, Respondent, et al.
144 N.Y. 645·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles S. Fairchild et al., as Executors, v. Margaret B. Edson, Appellant, Impleaded with The New York Association for Improving the Condition of the Poor, Respondent, et al.
(Argued November 26, 1894;
decided December 11, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made October 5,1894, which dismissed an appeal from a judgment entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
WilUam V. Rowe for appellant.
J. Mayhew Wawiwright for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.