Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Owensboro on the Air, Inc., et al. v. United States et al.; and McDonald, Trustee, v. United States et al., 1959 — 360 U.S. 911 · caselaw · US
General
Owensboro on the Air, Inc., et al. v. United States et al.; and McDonald, Trustee, v. United States et al.
360 U.S. 911·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 885.
No. 889.
Owensboro on the Air, Inc., et al. v. United States et al.; and McDonald, Trustee, v. United States et al.
Bussell Rowell for petitioners in No. 885. Vincent B. Welch, Harold E. Mott, Edward P. Morgan and James P. Kem for petitioner in No. 889. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon and John L. Fitzgerald for the United States and the Federal Communications Commission, respondents. James A. McKenna, Jr. and Vernon L. Wilkinson for American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., respondent in No. 885.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.