General
Louis LAVINE et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
5 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louis LAVINE et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
May 2, 1925.)
No. 3187.
In Error to the District Court of' the United States for the District, of New Jersey;
John Rellstab, Judge. J.. Irving Davidson, of Trenton, N. J., for plaintiffs in error.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOL-LEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
No principle of law is involved in this case. The two assignments of error question th'e court’s sustaining objections-to two questions asked in cross examination. There was no error in the court’s ruling, and-we therefore affirm the judgment below.