Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lehigh Valley Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania; Lehigh Valley Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania; Lehigh Valley Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania, 1891 — 145 U.S. 205 · caselaw · US
General
Lehigh Valley Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania; Lehigh Valley Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania; Lehigh Valley Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania
145 U.S. 20536 L. Ed. 676·Supreme Court of the United States·1891
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lehigh Valley Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania.
Error to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nos. 276, 428, 429.
Argued and decided with No. 275.
Mr. M. E. Olmstead for plaintiff in "rror.
Mr. James A. Stranahan for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY]
Mr. Chief Justice Fuller: These cases involve the same question as that just passed upon in Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. v. Commonwealth, supra, 192, and for the reasons there given the judgments are severally
Affirmed.