General
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
349 U.S. 945·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 737.
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
William E. Miller for petitioner.
Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Burger, Melvin Richter, Lionel Kestenbaum, Willard W. Gatchell and William J. Grove for the Federal Power Commission; Samuel Brezner for Wayne County, Michigan; Donald R. Richberg, Arthur R. Seder, Jr. and Charles V. Shannon for the American Louisiana Pipe Line Co. et al., and Oscar L. Chapman for the Michigan Consolidated Gas Co., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.