Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
MAYOR, COUNSELOR, and ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF ANNAPOLIS, Appellants, v. WASHINGTON, BALTIMORE AND ANNAPOLIS ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, and George Weems Williams, Receiver of said Corporation, Appellees, 1933 — 64 F.2d 1017 · caselaw · US
Corporations
MAYOR, COUNSELOR, and ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF ANNAPOLIS, Appellants, v. WASHINGTON, BALTIMORE AND ANNAPOLIS ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, and George Weems Williams, Receiver of said Corporation, Appellees
64 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MAYOR, COUNSELOR, and ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF ANNAPOLIS, Appellants, v. WASHINGTON, BALTIMORE AND ANNAPOLIS ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, and George Weems Williams, Receiver of said Corporation, Appellees.
No. 3465.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
April 10, 1933.
Adams & Hargest, of Baltimore, Md., for appellants.
George Weems Williams and William L. Marbury, Jr., both of Baltimore, Md., for ap-pellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Case dismissed under rule 20 by agreement of counsel.