Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lisa MADIGAN, et al., Petitioners v. Harvey N. LEVIN., 2013 — 134 S. Ct. 2 · caselaw · US
General
Lisa MADIGAN, et al., Petitioners v. Harvey N. LEVIN.
134 S. Ct. 2187 L. Ed. 2d 1·Supreme Court of the United States·2013
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lisa MADIGAN, et al., Petitioners
v.
Harvey N. LEVIN.
No. 12-872.
Supreme Court of the United States
Oct. 15, 2013.
Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of Illinois, Michael A. Scodro, Counsel of Record, Solicitor General, Jane Elinor Notz, Deputy Solicitor General, Brett E. Legner, Clifford W. Berlow, Matthew P. Becker, Asst. Attorneys General, Chicago, IL, for Petitioners.
Eric Schnapper, University of Washington, School of Law, Seattle, WA, Harvey N. Levin, Chicago, IL, Edward Theobald, Counsel of Record, Chicago, IL, Counsel for Respondent.
Prior report: C.A.11, 692 F.3d 607.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.