General
Katie Roberts WILSON, Appellant, v. Margaret Jane ROBINSON, Jane Doe Robinson, John Doe Robinson, Rosanna Agnew, Guardian, Margaret Jane Robinson, Jane Doe, and John Doe, Appellees
17 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Katie Roberts WILSON, Appellant, v. Margaret Jane ROBINSON, Jane Doe Robinson, John Doe Robinson, Rosanna Agnew, Guardian, Margaret Jane Robinson, Jane Doe, and John Doe, Appellees.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 7, 1927.)
No. 4742.
See, also, 16 F.(2d) 431.
F. C. Reagan and Edwin H. Flick, both of Seattle, Wash., for appellant.
Wesley Lloyd, of Tacoma, Wash., and George Dysart and C. D. Cunningham, both of Centralia, Wash., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The petition will be denied.
A similar order will be entered in each of the companion cases of Wilson v. Robinson et al. (No. 4743) 16 F.(2d) 432, and Lauridsen v. Alexander (No. 4744) 16 F.(2d) 432.