General
Timothy Derrick et al., as Administrators, etc., Respondents, v. Mary Louisa Emmens, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
133 N.Y. 676·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Timothy Derrick et al., as Administrators, etc., Respondents, v. Mary Louisa Emmens, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued May 24, 1892;
decided June 14, 1892.)
Appeal .from judgment of the General Term of the City Court of Brooklyn, entered upon an order made March 23, 1891, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special-Term.
Edward F. O'Dwyer for .appellant,
WiUiam Sullivan for respondents,-
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed._