Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
OMAHA NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA, Appellant, v. IOWA SERVICE CO. et al., 1928 — 25 F.2d 1021 · caselaw · US
Tax
OMAHA NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA, Appellant, v. IOWA SERVICE CO. et al.
25 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
OMAHA NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA, Appellant, v. IOWA SERVICE CO. et al.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
January 11, 1928.
No. 8039.
Appeal from the District Court o£ the United States for the District of Nebraska.
Halleck F. Rose, Arthur R. Wells, and Paul L. Martin, all of Omaha, Neb., for appellant.
F. H. Gaines, of Omaha, Neb., and George A. Lee, of Lincoln, Neb., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed, at costs of appellant, but without taxation of attorney fee, per stipulation of parties.